These scheduled offences are being a member of an unlawful assembly; rioting; certain offences against the person; abduction or kidnapping; extortion; burglary; robbery; preventing or resisting arrest; vandalism; mischief. Any person who is an accomplice Section 5 to a person convicted of arms use during a scheduled offence can likewise be executed. Trafficking in arms Section 6 is a capital offence in Singapore.
Sure, other reasons are also cited in support of capital punishment, but none as frequently, as the one on its perceived deterrent effect on crime. In Singapore, the government, as well as proponents of the death penalty, frequently point to the fact that the prevalence of drug problems or murders in our society is far lower than those in places which do not have the death penalty.
But is this really down to the presence of the death penalty or is the relatively low crime rate driven by other factors which are just as important, or perhaps even more important than the death penalty itself? It would seem that there is a severe lack of evidence to support the proposition that the death penalty is indeed a significant deterrent for capital crimes.
These studies concluded that it was in the public interest to retain the mandatory death penalty and to provide for limited circumstances where it would not apply. What is problematic however, is that the government has not published these studies to allow us to test the veracity and accuracy of their conclusions.
Further, criminological studies point in the opposite direction. In general, they have not been able to show that the death penalty is a significantly better deterrent than the next most severe punishment — life imprisonment.
But the more important observation is that the trend was generally similar in Singapore, even with the mandatory death penalty being retained for murder since its independence.
|Does the Mandatory Death Penalty work as a deterrent? | We Believe In Second Chances||These scheduled offences are being a member of an unlawful assembly; rioting; certain offences against the person; abduction or kidnapping; extortion; burglary; robbery; preventing or resisting arrest; vandalism; mischief.|
|There's no evidence that death penalty is a deterrent against crime||Messenger Capital punishment is such a costly, controversial, and divisive issue that, unless it succeeds in saving lives, it clearly should be abolished — as it already has been in the European Union and in countries around the world But does the death penalty save lives?|
What this tells us, the authors argue, is that the argument that the death penalty is a significant deterrent is flawed. While they also concede that zero deterrence cannot be proved, and that there is the possibility of a few marginal cases where the punishment has a deterrent effect, the general decline of homicide rates in a city without the MDP and a corresponding trend in one which retains the MDP, strongly suggests that other factors assume greater importance.
The authors have also argued elsewhere that the same principles apply for other capital crimes such as drug trafficking and they consistently maintain that there is no scientific evidence to show that the death penalty is an effective deterrent to homicide or drug crimes.
Even if the MDP does have a deterrent effect in marginal cases, the real question that needs to be asked is whether this can be achieved by less extreme forms of punishment.
For example, a person who may indeed be deterred from capital crime by the death penalty may also be deterred to the same extent by life imprisonment. In this context, the necessity of imposing the death penalty ceases to exist and it becomes almost impossible to justify. Again we would reiterate that the government has not put forward evidence to contradict the strong evidence against its case.
We would also urge the government to publish data and information to back up its stand on the deterrent effect of the death penalty and its mandatory application.
The government assured the Council that the provision of such data has already been implemented or was in the process of being implemented. Framed as a criminal justice issue, the death penalty and its mandatory application has not been adequately justified in light of evidence to the contrary.
On the available evidence, the connection between our low capital crime rates and the presence of the MDP is tenuous at best, and cannot be used to justify the continued use of a punishment that is not only extremely harsh, but also irreversible.
The paper, Executions, Deterrence and Homicide: A Tale of Two Cities is available for download here. The death penalty was abolished in practice in Hong Kong in and abolished in law in The writer omitted to mention the first part of the statement.
Any inconvenience is regretted.A majority, or 82 per cent of those polled, agreed that the death penalty is an important deterrent that has helped to keep Singapore safe from serious crimes. This is probably the biggest question surrounding the debate on the Mandatory Death Penalty (MDP) and perhaps, the death penalty itself.
Sure, other reasons are also cited in support of capital punishment, but none as frequently, as the one on its perceived deterrent effect on crime.
President Trump has called for the death penalty to be sentenced to some drug dealers. The decision comes after Attorney General Jeff Sessions called for longer and tougher prison sentences last year.
The death penalty has been effective in keeping Singapore one of the safest places in the world to work and live in. The application of the death penalty is only reserved for "very serious crimes". Singapore's death penalty laws and how they are applied, including death row and execution numbers, death-eligible crimes, methods of execution, appeals and clemency, availability of lawyers, prison conditions, ratification of international instruments, and recent developments.
Singapore News -Information from drug couriers has helped nab almost 90 traffickers since , Home Affairs and Law Minister K.
Shanmugam said yesterday, as he defended the use of the death.